<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Care Sanity May be In Sight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.easystand.com/2010/02/health-care-sanity-may-be-in-sight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.easystand.com/2010/02/health-care-sanity-may-be-in-sight/</link>
	<description>Standing Up for Your Health</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:26:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Reed</title>
		<link>http://blog.easystand.com/2010/02/health-care-sanity-may-be-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.easystand.com/?p=3701#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll soon be 67 years old and have been earning a paycheck for over 50 years. We are a single-income family because my wife and I are the legal guardians and care for our 30 daughter that has CP. She doesn&#039;t walk and is non-verbal. On top of that, my wife has had breast cancer. I can&#039;t retire because I couldn&#039;t afford the the insurance, if I could find coverage. Don&#039;t get me wrong I have a good job but I&#039;m not sure how many more years I can work 40-50 hour weeks and 24x7 support one week every 8 weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll soon be 67 years old and have been earning a paycheck for over 50 years. We are a single-income family because my wife and I are the legal guardians and care for our 30 daughter that has CP. She doesn&#8217;t walk and is non-verbal. On top of that, my wife has had breast cancer. I can&#8217;t retire because I couldn&#8217;t afford the the insurance, if I could find coverage. Don&#8217;t get me wrong I have a good job but I&#8217;m not sure how many more years I can work 40-50 hour weeks and 24&#215;7 support one week every 8 weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie P.</title>
		<link>http://blog.easystand.com/2010/02/health-care-sanity-may-be-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.easystand.com/?p=3701#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>Great suggestions, Mark. It&#039;s very refreshing to hear someone proposing free market-based solutions rather than endorsing increased government control, which would simply cause prices to rise even faster than they have been, and reduce the quality and availability of care.

One major improvement to our current system that was not part of your list is medical malpractice reform. The personal-injury lawyers have taken advantage of our current system, and this is one of the major sources of our skyrocketing costs; significant reforms are needed. One suggestion includes legalizing and promoting &quot;negative outcomes insurance.&quot; According to Ron Paul, &quot;Negative outcomes insurance is a novel approach that guarantees those harmed receive fair compensation, while reducing the burden of costly malpractice litigation on the health care system. Patients receive this insurance payout without having to endure lengthy lawsuits, and without having to give away a large portion of their award to a trial lawyer.&quot;

Also, we need to ensure that we keep the nutritional supplement market minimally regulated; pending legislation sponsored by John McCain threatens to drastically increase the costs of supplements, and begin to regulate many of them as prescription drugs. Such an approach would be a huge step in the wrong direction; it would move decisions from the individual consumer to their doctor, and would disastrously increase the cost of effective and safe over-the-counter treatments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great suggestions, Mark. It&#8217;s very refreshing to hear someone proposing free market-based solutions rather than endorsing increased government control, which would simply cause prices to rise even faster than they have been, and reduce the quality and availability of care.</p>
<p>One major improvement to our current system that was not part of your list is medical malpractice reform. The personal-injury lawyers have taken advantage of our current system, and this is one of the major sources of our skyrocketing costs; significant reforms are needed. One suggestion includes legalizing and promoting &#8220;negative outcomes insurance.&#8221; According to Ron Paul, &#8220;Negative outcomes insurance is a novel approach that guarantees those harmed receive fair compensation, while reducing the burden of costly malpractice litigation on the health care system. Patients receive this insurance payout without having to endure lengthy lawsuits, and without having to give away a large portion of their award to a trial lawyer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, we need to ensure that we keep the nutritional supplement market minimally regulated; pending legislation sponsored by John McCain threatens to drastically increase the costs of supplements, and begin to regulate many of them as prescription drugs. Such an approach would be a huge step in the wrong direction; it would move decisions from the individual consumer to their doctor, and would disastrously increase the cost of effective and safe over-the-counter treatments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

